Following a recent meeting between the Presidents of the United States and Russia in Alaska, diplomatic efforts to halt the Russia-Ukraine conflict have accelerated. Soon after the meeting, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the White House with European leaders fueled speculation that a ceasefire may be within reach.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has been actively pushing for peace negotiations. Although he had promised to halt the war within 24 hours of assuming office and could not deliver immediately, his initiatives have reinvigorated the process. Observers recall that, in the early months of the conflict, a Turkish-mediated peace attempt had come close to success before European nations pushed Ukraine to resist concessions.
Analysts highlight Europe’s dual role in the conflict. While providing Ukraine with aid and the promise of NATO membership, European powers also took a hardened stance against Russia, which prolonged the war and deepened Ukraine’s economic and military strain.
So far, talks have focused only on halting hostilities. The future of occupied territories, ceasefire terms, and security guarantees remain unresolved. European nations continue to insist that Ukraine must be fully supported, arguing that Russia is gradually weakening. Meanwhile, differences persist within the U.S., where some political voices call for improving relations with Moscow, while Europe remains firm on maintaining pressure.
A notable aspect of the current negotiations is their venue—Alaska. Unlike past peace efforts, which traditionally began in Europe, this shift is seen by some experts as a signal that the role of Europe in this round of talks may be minimized.
India’s role has emerged prominently. Ahead of the Alaska summit, India’s National Security Advisor visited Moscow and facilitated dialogue between leaders. Following his meeting with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi by phone, underscoring India’s growing significance in the peace process.
The global push for a ceasefire stands at a critical juncture. The coming days will determine whether these efforts can lead to lasting peace or result only in a temporary break in hostilities.
